Captain Jack's Grande Adventures - Latest Comments in Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Guest — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:54:49 -0000

He has done posters for many Automobile Concours d'Elegance and other automobile events such american flag wallpaper as the Monterey Historic Races, Houston Classi-Chassis and Carroll Shelby Nationals.

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

ryn — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:55:59 -0000

Whats the easiest way to do all 4 steps? Sexual framing?

Sexual framing would cover game dynamic 1, ... and 2, 3... wow lol. And 4 is that just pure machismo? In set for your SNLs is this all you think about?

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Captain Jack — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:49:09 -0000

That's one of the risks if you totally devalidate it and she feels like it can't be repaired or it would be too hard... But, that usually requires a LOT of that... if you challenge it and she responds with what you consider to be a valid attempt at Clarifying then you accept it and it is not clear and strong.

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

driftwood — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:56:49 -0000

But by your theory, if you threaten the game dynamic, won't that cause the game to fall apart?

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

telluride — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:22:01 -0000

i just finished reading your first two posts about game dynamics, and i have to tell you, you are fucking brilliant. i have noticed all this, but i didn't understand it ... sets open easier the second time around ... the more you play the easier it gets ... the more you game the more women are attracted ... but i never understood why it happened. And nobody else talks about it. You have unlocked the treasure chest and i think this is a big, big key ... i believe this is your greatest achievement to date... and there have been many. Kudos ... highest regards ... RT

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

T. AKA Ricky Raw — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:46:34 -0000

Great post, but just want to point out that it seems your links at the end of the post are broken.

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Name — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:25:12 -0000

Awesome Post!

Are these Game Dynamics gonna be a part of your eCoaching Bootcamp?

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Captain Jack — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:44:22 -0000

Thanks to whoever submitted the page to StumbleOn!

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Monstar — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:38:17 -0000

These last 2 posts are amazing! Hopefully you could clarify these points in the future.

Disqualifiers work because they threaten agreement on Game Dynamic 1. See that? If there isn’t agreement on all the Game Dynamics, there is NO GAME, thus no chance of winning. Jealousy Thread threatens Game Dynamic 2.

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Dumban — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:35:33 -0000

I'm impressed by the development of the "player in the game" theory. I will read it a few times to try to understand it deeply. My first impression is remembering when Sinn wrote in his blog about the game people plays, I don't know why I associated haha.
One thing is sure, the whole MM DHV thing sucks, SF rules!

I keep shocked, looking forward to read more of this :D

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

Hammer — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:09:02 -0000

Really great stuff. It's like the Super String Theory of pickup! You should put Lady Gaga's "Love Game" as background music to this post.