<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Captain Jack's Grande Adventures - Latest Comments in Wang Stew</title><link>http://captainjacksadventures.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://captainjacksadventures.disqus.com/wang_stew/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:22:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, I was emailing someone with the surname Wang around the time of reading this, and all I could think about was chunky crap. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Craig&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wangtastic!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You dont need to neg, but one thing i realised is knowing how to neg is really important. Having the feeling that you can neg if you want is good too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this is an amazing post, cj!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;really eye opening, especially for guys that are in the community quite a while now and don't get the results they want. and there are a lot of them out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;along with sinn's recent post about fundamentals i would recommend this to every beginner so that they start this thing the right way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks a lot for sharing this!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-jay&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;crac, hey man glad it helped! I'll be doing more vidoes in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a, I've written about the non-useful presupps quite a bit in scattered posts. Probably time for a dedicated post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ CJ ~&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Captain Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This might be one of the most important posts I have read in a while. It's interesting, because I never neg and I still get attraction on a regular basis. I would love to hear about any more bad presuppositions you believe are out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wang Stew</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2008/02/wang-stew/#comment-2622080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CJ, I love you, thank you for making that sticking point analysis...before it I couldnt even qualify, NOW I can actually qualify...on to my next sticking points. Thank you. &lt;br&gt;-Jason&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CraC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>